Archive for May, 2008

Rochester, Dover, Portsmouth all fail to make grade

Friday, May 9th, 2008

Friday, May 9, 2008
Fosters

DOVER — Local schools and school districts are seeing small successes among the continued struggle to meet the federal standards of Adequate Yearly Progress.

Rochester, Portsmouth and Dover were among several districts listed as needing improvement in reading or math. Rollinsford is a first-year district in need of improvement in reading and also missed math for the first time.

Farmington and Barrington each made AYP in reading this year, bringing those districts back to academic success in that area after missing last year.

According to the state Department of Education, Adequate Yearly Progress is accomplished only if a school or district meets performance targets established for students in reading and mathematics, as well as state targets for student participation, attendance and graduation. Student performance as a whole is measured, as well as the performance of specific subgroups, which are broken down by ethnicity, socioeconomic status, educational disability and no or limited English proficiency.

If a district or school does not meet standards in both grade groupings in the same target area, they are listed as needing improvement and do not make the Adequate Yearly Progress list. A school or district can miss AYP in one of the target areas for one year without being listed as in need of improvement in that area, but if it is missed a second consecutive time, they become in need of improvement.

Rochester has been listed as needing improvement almost every year the federal AYP has been released. While the district improved over last year and made AYP in reading this year, thus clearing it of being in need of improvement in reading, the district missed AYP in math for the fourth year in a row. Also, six of its schools are schools in need of improvement. Rochester Middle School made AYP this year but remains a school in need of improvement in reading for the third year and in math for the second year. The Chamberlain Elementary and East Rochester schools also made AYP, but remain schools in need of improvement. The McClelland School is a school in need of improvement for the second year in reading and math, and Spaulding High School is a school in need of improvement in reading for the first year and in math for the fourth year.

After two consecutive years of not meeting AYP, parents have the option to send their children to other public schools. In the third year, students from low-income families are eligible to receive supplemental educational services, such as tutoring or remedial classes, from a provider approved by the state and selected by parents. If a school fails to make AYP for four consecutive years, the state can replace teachers and a new curriculum can be put into place. In the fifth year, the state can take control of the school, reopen as a charter school or be turned over to a private company.

Rochester Superintendent Mike Hopkins said the important thing for people to understand about the district is that it made AYP in reading and that “significant progress” has been made in each of the district’s schools.

But like many other districts, Rochester is consistently listed as needing improvement because of subgroups identified by the federal program, including special education and economically disadvantaged students. The larger population of the district also increases the likelihood of having such students who cannot perform at the level of an average student, but are still tested as such.

While progress was made in the economically disadvantaged subgroup, Rochester missed the Black or African Americans subgroup in math this year for the first time.

AYP in all subgroups must be met for the district to meet AYP.

“Unfortunately it becomes, ‘The district didn’t make a subgroup’” instead of the focus being on success in the other testing areas, Hopkins said. “It’s easy to focus on that one thing.”

As many of the district’s schools made AYP this year and “incredible progress” has been made at the middle school, Hopkins said the plans put in place for improvement are having an impact.

Portsmouth has advanced to a second year of being a district in need of improvement in reading but made AYP in math again. The New Franklin School made AYP in reading but missed math for the second year in a row, making it a school in need of improvement in math.

Some districts that met AYP last year and were cleared of their status of being in need of improvement are once again back on the list.

Districts must make AYP two years in a row in order to be cleared of the status of being a district in need of improvement.

Dover made this accomplishment last year. This year, the district is in need of improvement in reading for the first year. It also missed math.

Superintendent John O’Connor said there has been an effort to improve reading as the district has instituted a new language arts curriculum that focuses on spelling and grammar. The district also is piloting a series of reading programs that should begin next year.

“If what we’re doing is getting the same results, then we need to change what we’re doing and I’m trying to impress that upon our teaching staff,” O’Connor said.

Several school districts, including Somersworth, Governor Wentworth, Strafford and Milton, are celebrating academic success as they are not listed as districts in need of improvement.

“We’re pleased we’re not a district in need of improvement,” said Somersworth Superintendent Karen Soule. “We’ve already met and begun to look at the results.”

However, both Maple Wood and Hilltop Elementary schools are listed as schools in need of improvement. Hilltop School is a school in need of improvement in reading for the second year and in math for the first year. Maple Wood is in need of improvement in reading for a third year and missed AYP in math for the first time this year.

Soule said those schools are considering appealing their “in need of improvement” designations, but could not elaborate further.

Somersworth Middle School is in need of improvement in reading for the second year and in math for the first year.

While Somersworth High School is in need of improvement in reading for the first year, it exited that status for graduation rate.

Soule said the dropout rate going down at the high school “really helped” and the district will continue to look at reading for improvement next year.

Rollinsford, which is a one-school district, is listed as a first-year district in need of improvement in reading, and Soule said she thinks the school will “take this as a real opportunity to look at what they are doing.”

She noted Rollinsford Grade School’s “great staff and hard work” and said they only missed AYP because of one subgroup.

Rollinsford needs to make AYP in math next year to avoid becoming a district in need of improvement in math.

Farmington can celebrate clearing its status as a district in need of improvement in reading. It did, however, advance to its second year as a district in need of improvement in math.

Statewide results show that of the 162 districts where reports were issued, 86 districts made AYP and 75 did not. This number is up from just 13 districts in need of improvement in 2006 and about 30 last year.

According to Barrington Superintendent Mike Morgan, school officials there are “very pleased” with the results this year as they made AYP in reading. The district must make it next year to be cleared of its status as a district in need of improvement in reading.

“That’s major for Barrington, especially in reading, because that’s where we put our effort,” Morgan said. “It shows we’re taking No Child Left Behind seriously.”

The district is “really trying to consistently get better” at what it does by increasing professional development and instituting an updated math program, Morgan said.

Like Rochester, Barrington missed math this year because of the special education subgroup.

“We have to do better with them,” he said.

Educators have said since No Child Left Behind began in 2001 that it sets an impossible goal and the program is having an opposite effect. The goal of the federal No Child Left Behind Act is that all students demonstrate 100 percent proficiency by 2013-2014, and the performance targets increase every two years. This year, schools and districts must have 86 percent of their students successful in reading and 82 percent in math.

“There is no way 100 percent of schools and 100 percent of districts can have 100 percent proficiency levels,” Barrington’s Morgan said. “It’s going to keep going up.”

O’Conner said, “You’re always concerned about the repercussions” of No Child Left Behind guidelines. “There’s a lot of criticism, but really the bottom line is there needs to be some measure of accountability and we need to at least meet those standards.”

The N.H. Department of Education is using its Follow the Child initiative to track the individual progress of students. Those scores also have been made available along with the No Child Left Behind results on the Department of Education website at www.ed.state.nh.us/education/

Rochester, Manchester schools again cited for lack of progress

Friday, May 9th, 2008

Friday, May 9, 2008
Union Leader

School progress reports released yesterday by the state Department of Education keep city schools on a short list requiring “corrective action.”

The reports are based on statewide assessment tests in reading and mathematics given to students in grades 3 through 8 and grade 11 in October.

Manchester and Rochester districts failed to make “adequate yearly progress” for the fifth straight year.

If the same results play out next spring, both districts will be labeled in need of “restructuring,” a federal designation under the No Child Left Behind law that would be uncharted water in New Hampshire.

Yesterday’s report said almost 300 New Hampshire schools have received failing grades on their annual progress reports.

One-hundred-seventy-five schools achieved passing progress in all areas. Two-hundred-eighty-two schools failed one or more targets and 17 are waiting to have their progress calculated.

State law prevents the DOE from taking over day-to-day operations of a local school or district, but state officials would have to step up their involvement, said Deborah Wiswell, administrator for accountability at the education department.

Corrective action is a two-year process, she said. The first — this school year, for Manchester — involves planning. The second is implementing that plan.

In making AYP announcements last year, Education Commissioner Lyonel Tracy said the state would have a presence in Manchester schools.

Tracy hired a team of educational consultants from Brown University to help shape the district improvement plan. That group’s work continues.

“Just this past week they met with a focus group of teachers,” said Wiswell. “They don’t tell them what to do, but they quantify and help organize information.”

The city’s corrective action plan has taken more time to finalize than originally hoped, said Wiswell, in part because of mid-year turnover in the superintendent’s office.

“We’ve already met with Tom Brennan to talk about what we can do,” she said, referring to Manchester’s recently hired superintendent, who starts work July 1.

Individual schools are also measured for AYP.

Six schools in New Hampshire are now considered in need of restructuring, including Northwest Elementary in Manchester.

But the school’s acting principal, Shelly Larochelle, said Northwest is not a “failing” school. Test results continue to show progress, she said.

State assessment tests classify students in subgroups based on ethnicity, socioeconomic status, educational disability and English proficiency.

“There are 14 subgroups,” said Larochelle, “and from 2006 we’ve made progress in all subgroups but one.”

She said teachers and administrators pour over test results each year and formulate a plan of attack to bring grades up.

“It’s a work in progress from year to year,” she said, focusing attention on individual students, certain classrooms and specific grade levels.

Last year, just one subgroup tripped Northwest up and kept it on the state’s watch list. The rising minimum standards, however, make it difficult to keep up.

“We made it as a whole school last year,” said Larochelle. “If (standards) had stayed the same, we would have made it again this year.”

Henry Aliberti, Manchester’s acting superintendent of schools, said he hadn’t had a chance to review the AYP reports.

Wiswell agreed the news coming out of the city’s schools isn’t all grim.

“In every group,” she said, “Manchester is moving kids out of level one (the lowest scores). It’s going to be a while before they make AYP, but they are improving. The bar goes up every year.”

Failing to make AYP two consecutive years in the same area of testing puts individual schools and districts under the “in need of improvement” label under NCLB.

To make AYP, a school or district must meet performance targets established for students in reading and mathematics, as well as meet state targets for student participation, attendance, and high school graduation.

NCLB requires that all students nationwide demonstrate proficiency by 2014.

Material from the Associated Press was used in this story.

The council gets it right on Skyhaven; Unruly residents detracted from the process

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

Thursday, May 8, 2008
Fosters

The Rochester City Council filed a new flight plan Tuesday night — one that called for not landing at Skyhaven Airport.

Last month, the council, on a 9-4 vote, opted to have the city own the airport. It was a rescission of a 6-6 vote in February that failed to advance a position on the city’s intent regarding the airport.

Tuesday night’s vote was 7-5 with remarks by Deputy Mayor Elaine Lauterborn putting a credible face on the folly of Rochester owning the facility adjacent to Route 108 and near the top of Rochester Hill.

In April, Lauterborn voted to pursue city ownership. Tuesday night she conceded the city cannot take on even minor costs associated with the facility.

“The smallest percentage of the money that is the responsibility of Rochester is still a significant amount,” Lauterborn said.

As for capital improvements that will most surely evolve to keep the airport current in future years, the deputy mayor offered, “I do believe the PDA (the Pease Development Authority) is in a better position to deal with the capital costs” that will be made necessary in the future.

The City Council got it right this time.

There have been three votes on Skyhaven and the council has flown back and forth and back again. While no one was advocating another flight in the wake of Tuesday night’s vote, there were signs of leaving a hangar door open until May 30, the present deadline for a decision on whether Rochester will absorb the airport and its uncertainties or let it go to the PDA with its knowledge of general aviation and managing an airport.

City Manager John Scruton wasn’t going to speculate on whether there would be another shift in the wind and the usually seldom inscrutable Councilor Sandra Keans simply said, “one never knows.”

City councilors felt the direct heat of public opinion Tuesday and there were times when it wasn’t pretty.

It was an energized opposition crowd that voiced its feelings in unmasked anger.

“You won’t get in again,” a woman warned first-term Councilor Geoffrey Hamman, who again voted for city ownership.

Fred Leonard, no stranger to Rochester politics, stepped over the line in throwing a sign in the direction of Hamman. This came after he shouted — while the voting was taking place — “Some people have no honor” adding in anger, “There’s going to be a revolution.”

Pity the revolutionaries with Leonard as a member.

The suggestion of Rochester owning an airport in the best of times is not something with which many people will feel comfortable. While politics in Rochester is cyclical, it’s a community in which the cycle can turn on a dime.

The city’s streets and roads are a mess and have been for some time. The money to make lasting repairs is seldom present and even when it is, the quality of the work has been known to raise some eyebrows.

Confrontation is as much a part of Rochester city government as corn beef is with cabbage.

Rochester is a community in which political maturity does not get high marks. But so it has been as long as some septuagenarians can remember. It doesn’t have to own an airport to spice things up.

The thought of a Rochester City Council being the final arbiter in matters of importance to the airport and its future creates a cold and clammy feeling.

Let it go. The Pease Development Authority is prepared and qualified to take over Skyhaven Airport and save the Rochester City Council from itself.

Let it go. Please, let it go.

Cigarette Taxes are Fueling Organized Crime

Wednesday, May 7th, 2008

This commentary appeared in the Wall Street Journal on May 7, 2008.
Tax Foundation

Cigarette Taxes Are Fueling Organized Crime

Last month, New York law enforcement authorities announced the arrest of Queens resident Rafea al-Nablisi for smuggling 12,000 cartons of cigarettes a week. It was not the first such arrest, and thanks to New York’s latest cigarette tax hike, it will not be the last.

On April 23, less than two weeks after Mr. Nablisi’s arrest was made public, Gov. David Paterson signed into law a $1.25 per-pack tax hike on top of the state’s $1.50 per-pack tax. That’s in addition to New York City’s own $1.50 per-pack tax. Come July 1, New York City’s smokers will be paying on average $9 a pack for legal cigarettes.

But if history is any guide, most cigarettes sold will actually be trucked up from Virginia, or shipped in from China, by “butt-leggers” who can make over $1 million on each tractor-trailer load of smuggled smokes. The blunt fact, which politicians of both political parties are determined to ignore, is that high cigarette taxes in New York have led to a bloody, decades-long smuggling epidemic.

While the problem first surfaced during the Great Depression, tax hikes in the early 1960s created a major profit opportunity for smugglers and kicked the epidemic into high gear. By 1967, a quarter of the cigarettes consumed in the Empire State were bootlegged. New York City’s finance administrator labeled cigarette smuggling the “principal stoking facility of the engine of organized crime.”

Read More…

Skyhaven won’t fly; Council does about-face on owning airport

Wednesday, May 7th, 2008

Wednesday, May 7, 2008
Fosters

ROCHESTER — Before councilors reversed course Tuesday yet again on the city owning Skyhaven Airport — this time saying they don’t want it — it looked like nothing would change. Residents became angry.

“Some people have no honor,” Fred Leonard shouted while voting was taking place. “There’s going to be a revolution.” Then he threw a sign in the direction of Councilor Geoffrey Hamann, who again voted for ownership, despite hearing from more than 50 constituents who opposed the idea.

Dozens of residents, thinking their pre-meeting protest of about 80 people was for naught, began to shout at councilors and leave the chamber. “You won’t get in again,” a woman warned the first-term Hamann and others supporting a city-run airport.

Mayor John Larochelle sought order — reminding the boisterous crowd it is illegal to interrupt a public meeting — and voting resumed. The tally showed a 7-5 vote that, for now at least, ended planning for local control of the 175-acre, Route 108 facility.

The vote did away with last month’s 9-4 pro-ownership vote orchestrated by Councilor Doug Lachance. On this night, councilors were reconsidering last month’s vote, which successfully rescinded the February 6-6 vote that failed to advance a city position and signaled to the state that it should plan for the Pease Development Authority to be the next owners.

Voting against ownership Tuesday were Councilors Pete Lachapelle, Ralph Torr, Chuck Grassie, Ray Lundborn, Brian Labranche, Deputy Mayor Elaine Lauterborn and Mayor John Larochelle.

Voting for ownership were Lachance, Hamann, Charles Gerrish, Ray Varney and Sandra Keans.

Councilor Rick Healey, who supported ownership the second time around, was excused from the meeting; a colleague said he was traveling with family.

Torr, Grassie and Lauterborn all supported local control before, but Tuesday was different.

Lauterborn said though she supports the airport, the city can’t even take on the minor costs of maintaining it. “The smallest percentage of the money that is the responsibility of Rochester is still a significant amount of money,” she said. “I do believe the PDA is in a better position to deal with the capital costs” necessary to bolster the airport.

Torr had second thoughts coming into the meeting after reviewing budgetary information for the last couple of weeks as a member of a committee paving the way for local control. The benefits he saw are “so marginal and after you go out three years who knows what’s going to happen.”

Grassie said he changed his mind after “I looked at more of the information.” He said the public outcry had nothing to do with his vote — in fact, he said, he considered sticking to his previous vote to rebuke some of the public’s comments.

Hamann’s decision to again back the airport was surprising. Though he said he personally supports the city running the facility, he found residents who contacted him disagree and “I can’t vote against everyone.”

Lachance, who’s been chairing a special committee creating an airport management structure, pleaded with colleagues to put off the vote for two weeks so he and committee members Keans, Varney and Torr could present a budget.

“We feel that the budget is complete,” he said. “It shows a very positive cash flow. … We believe as a committee that the budget we’re going to propose is very, very real. We don’t feel it’s misleading to anybody.”

Lundborn, who pushed for the third vote, took exception when Lachance said it was wrong to vote on a night charged with resident emotion and not wait for more information.

“We’re not doing this at 10:30 at night after a closed-door meeting,” Lundborn said to cheers. During the protest, residents expressed frustration with the second vote coming not only out of the blue, but so late at night.

Lachance took offense, saying Skyhaven was never discussed in the April nonpublic session. Residents had little sympathy, with several of them mocking him with sarcastic cries.

Neither Lachance’s committee nor City Manager John Scruton ever presented their own budget, instead relying on information gleaned from consultants and members of the Skyhaven Airport Operations Commission. But some councilors and city administration came to agree that the airport would operate in the black for at least the next three years, while commission members presented a positive financial outlook of operational and capital costs.

The state Bureau of Aeronautics, which has overseen the airport for the state, shows the airport running a $2,600 deficit through the end of March, but anticipated revenue will give the airport as much as a $40,000 surplus, according to the commission.

Lachance and other Skyhaven enthusiasts never trumpeted city control as a way to generate loads of revenue or lower the tax rate. Supporters said the city would gain control of a significant asset that would pay for itself and potentially generate economic activity that could drive up commercial land values.

Keans made a last-ditch effort to block a change. She stressed the city would only have to pay 2.5 percent of capital costs like extending the runway under existing arrangements with the Federal Aviation Administration.

“We hear it’s a black hole. It’s a black hole because the state of New Hampshire was running it …” before a successful fixed-base operator got on the scene, she said.

Some councilors never saw the benefit — and residents worrying the tax rate will rise by $3.99 under the proposed tax rate said there was no way the city should consider taking on additional responsibilities.

“I said I will keep an open mind,” said Lachapelle, “but it’s losing money. … It’s not going anywhere. It’s always going to be an airport.”

Lundborn said local government should be focused on providing essential services, like road repairs, and not enter the “airport business.”

Before the meeting, residents surrounded City Hall, waving signs denouncing “sneaky late-night maneuvers” on the airport and stressing the need for “roadways — not runways.” Leo Gosselin came wearing a denim shirt with a fake knife driven into his back.

For Donna Moulton, it was the second protest she ever attended. The first had to do with steel traps and foxes. “It’s just going to add one more thing to the budget — no matter what they say,” said Moulton. “Housing and the economy is down and the cost of living is up. So why take anything else on when people are just trying to keep it together? Why do something you don’t have to?”

For Chuck Slone, it was his first protest since the Vietnam War. He said he can’t understand how a community could explore running an airport that for many years never turned a profit when taxes are set to rise unless deep budget cuts are made.

Residents waited to greet — and jeer — councilors as they arrived for the meeting. In interviews, they expressed distrust of their local officials and amazement at their decision to take on an airport.

Asked about councilors who claim the airport will be paid for by users and not raise taxes, former Mayor Fred Steadman replied: “They said that about the Opera House and it’s cost us money and it still does.” Next year’s proposed budget includes funds for overhead costs at the Opera House.

“To me,” Steadman said of the airport, “it appears it’s a place for the … rich … to store their toys.”

“If it was a money-making proposition, the state would not give it away,” said Priscilla Boudreau. “We’re going to get an airport but for 37 years” — how long she’s lived here — “we can’t even fix our roads.”

The City Hall parking lot got crowded before the meeting started, and a police officer was ready to ticket Mitch Michaud’s Ford if he didn’t move it. “It’s the only thing that runs right around here,” he said to laughs.

“It doesn’t matter if we run it, if the PDA runs it — it’s not leaving town,” Michaud said of Skyhaven. “We don’t need the burden.”

The latest state law gives the city until May 30 to make a decision or see Skyhaven go to Pease.

There was no talk of there being a fourth vote to decide the issue, which has been kicking about for several years. But Scruton wasn’t going to speculate about whether it was really over, and Keans said “one never knows.”