Archive for January, 2010

Rochester Taxpayers Attend Slots Meeting

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

Gaming official woos public in Rochester with plan for slot machines
Fosters

ROCHESTER — A Millennium Gaming executive showed his hand to the public Wednesday night when he openly discussed a proposal to build a casino with 5,000 slot machines at Rockingham Park in Salem.

Millennium Gaming executive Bill Wortman owns and operates casinos in Las Vegas and Pennsylvania and would like to expand his business into New Hampshire, if legislation is passed to expand gambling. At a public meeting organized by Sen. Jackie Cilley, D-Barrington, Wednesday night, he laid out his proposal and defended gambling from what detractors point to as its more unsavory aspects.

Robert Gates, president of the Rochester Concerned Taxpayers Association, attended and openly questioned the theory that casino revenues would lower his property tax bill.

Gates also opined that, aside from the other perceived unsavory aspects of gambling, “the allure of riches” might also lead people to gamble away disposable income instead of contributing to philanthropic efforts. Gates is on the board of advisers for the local Salvation Army.

Read More…

Perhaps there were not many opponents there because NH residents had little notice of this meeting.

The article further stated that “The University of New Hampshire’s Carsey Institute will organize small group discussions on this issue in 11 communities on February 13. Rochester and Portsmouth will both host such gatherings. The results of the discussions will go to the Gov. John Lynch’s Study Commission on Expanded Gaming.”

Rochester Must Reject “Big Picture” Schools

Monday, January 25th, 2010

For the RCTA
by Jane Aitken

It has come to my attention that the City of Rochester is being asked to consider the construction of a second, ’small’ high school.

While I do not dispute the idea that smaller schools and classes can be more conducive to learning, the community must be made aware of certain facts that may immediately send up a red flag.

As a teacher of almost 35 years, I am a proponent of strong curricular standards and content, and the use of proven teaching methods to deliver that content. I believe that success can be achieved by hiring teachers who are experts in their fields, and then empowering them with the proper scope, sequence, and materials. They also must be allowed to employ proven methodologies, as well as given ample support in all disciplinary matters.

But lately, it seems that our tax dollars are not going to support the classroom or the hardworking teachers that work in them all day long and beyond. They have instead been hijacked by salesmen from the education ‘industry’.

These education industry operators sell at huge prices their services which include designing new schools, selling new methodologies, and offering workshops that guarantee the teachers will come to any conclusions you wish them to during their ‘retraining’ sessions. (Delphi Technique) These salesmen are more often no more than highly motivated charlatans who take advantage of the money we spend on our extreme desire to improve our schools in any way we can. An example of one of these education industry operations is the Quaglia Institute of Student Aspirations to which the state of NH paid $250,000 to Russell Quaglia in 2008 to administer “happiness surveys” to high school students.

The list of snake-oil salesmen is far too long to delve into here, but they abound.

The Big Picture is just another one of a vast network of revolutionary school ‘movements’ that are attempting to make social changes within our society using our children as political pawns. If you peruse their website you will see that the founder is Dennis Littky. Littky’s history with the failed Thayer Academy in Winchester NH Part I and Part II should speak for itself. Project-based learning, or ‘constructivism’ is listed as one of their methodologies, something that has been proven a failure. The philosophy employed is based on a similar model known as the Theodore Sizer Coalition of Essential Schools, something that is used in Souhegan School District and also considered to be a failure. Jargon such as “authentic assessment”, and “collaborative learning”, are more indications that progressive experimentation is being used in these schools. For a complete list of eduspeak terms and lingo and the translation of same, see The Illinois Loop lingo page.

Another program trying to make its way into NH schools comes from UNESCO, administered from Geneva, Switzerland and is called International Baccalaureate. The world view it presents is often not pro-American. It admits it wants to create global citizens and teaches government from the UN’s point of view.

In any case, I urge the citizens of Rochester to do some further investigation on the founders of the “Big Picture” schools and know what it is you may be buying into.

With all the money we spend on education in NH it would seem that we simply have to summon the courage to do what is right, not what we are told by these self-described educational snake-oil salesmen and psychologists coming from the Annenberg School, the home of William Ayers and other educationists.

One final disturbing but not surprising discovery was the mention of their ‘good friend William Ayers’ on the Big Picture website in conjunction with the The Small Schools Workshop, which he co-directs and in a quote from the writer who said he was his ‘good friend’.

It is commonly known by those who study this issue that our schools are being used to effect social justice and political change on the taxpayers dime, but without much of a record of academic success.

It is my thought that NH schools can instill excellence without buying into yet another fad program.

Rochester, don’t fall for it!

###

Jane Aitken taught in the public schools for almost 35 years and is currently available to speak about educational issues all over the State of NH.

Big Picture Experiment

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

After viewing Mr. Shea’s explanation of his dream regarding the Big Step Forward on television and reviewing the document on the School Department website, I must say there are a lot of unanswered questions. For starters why must our students be test subjects yet again? We tried open concept and that failed. We then went to block scheduling and that is under review. A new scheduling format is supposedly planned, but no change will be made until 2011-2012 school year. If a plan is in place, why are we waiting so long?

When Mr. Shea presented this idea a year ago, he stated that this new school would not have music, art, sports, in other words no extra curricula activities and would absolutely not allow the student to partake in the offerings of the Technical Center and would be budget neutral. Has anybody ever seen any new project that is budget neutral? Obviously, some of Mr. Shea’s ideas did not bode well with parents and Mr. Shea’s original dream has transformed into something different something that will now include a little bit of this and that, but not quite what is offered at Spaulding.

Funding is a major issue and there just does not seem to be much out there for the taking. I know my pocketbook is dry. This topic has been presented like a bill in congress, making concessions along the way to ensure that it gets passed no matter what the people may think. Do we, the taxpayer, really need another school, a school where the concept is unproven/untested? Like most, I do not wish to see my taxes go up any further. I do not feel that we are harming our children’s education by not providing funding or approving Mr. Shea’s experiment.

We need to re-evaluate what we already pay for. It is time to eliminate the waste, as a school district we are top heavy with administration and there are numerous examples of blatant fiscal irresponsibility on the part of the School Department, but nobody ever stands up to them and they get everything they want.

If you are unable to attend either of the two meetings regarding the Big Step Forward call your School Board member and City Councilor and express your concerns. By not making your feelings known and not attending the meetings the School Department will take this as a signal that you do not care what they do with YOUR money. It is time to speak up as things are not going to get better for a long time to come.

Sue O’Connor
Rochester

Public Employees’ Flush New Year

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

NY Post

“It looks like a happy new year for you — if you’re a public employee.

That’s the takeaway from a recent Rasmussen poll that shows that 46 percent of government employees say the economy is getting better, while just 31 percent say it’s getting worse. In contrast, 32 percent of those with private-sector jobs say the economy is getting better, while 49 percent say it is getting worse.

Nearly half, 44 percent, of government employees rate their personal finances as good or excellent. Only 33 percent of private-sector employees do.

It sounds like public- and private-sector employees are looking at different Americas. And they are.”

Read More…

Unions vs Race to the Top

Thursday, January 14th, 2010

Wall Street Journal

“Teachers unions in Minnesota and Florida are currently threatening to withhold support for their state Race to the Top applications, which are due later this month. So is the school boards association in Louisiana. This matters because the Administration has placed a premium on states garnering “local school district support” in order to win a grant. Not having union buy-in isn’t fatal, but it definitely hurts a state’s chances of getting federal funds.”